|
Appendix
Some
Colossal Blunders made by Deans and Faculties
A Faculty of
mathematics advised, there can be more than one solution
to an equation and hence we may get, x = 1 and x = +4 in
one and same equation; but we cannot say 1 = +4 and so,
we cannot clarify 0 =
 .
I replied that only second degree equations can provide
two solutions to X and what I had presented to him then
was a theoretic first degree equation and so there can be
only one solution to X in that first degree equation.
Also, we get the result of that equation to be equal to
0/0, the values of which range from -
to +
at the same time each value coincides with 0 and so, 0
=
must be a reality in such conditions. He stared at me; but
did not say anything more about it.
According to
some Faculties, the condition 0 =
is purely philosophical and according to them the above
condition cannot be observed with in the atmosphere or on
earth; but you may see that the above conclusion of the
article is not merely related to any philosophy or a fairy
tale but is a universal reality.
According to a young
scientist, the base which I have taken into consideration
is purely imaginary and hence, any building built upon
such a virtual base cannot claim its existence.
Another Great Faculty
of Physics judged the statement 0 =
to be not substantive; but my article reveals that it can
actually withstand all requirements of physics with
reference to the context under consideration.
A Head of
Department of Mathematics of a University expressed his
strong dislike that he could approve my finding 0 =
to be correct only when the handle of a cycle begins to
rotate. I humbly drew his attention to the remarks made by
Prof. S.L. Loney only to result in his sharp retort, "But
Loney didnt remark further".
A Head of
Department of Mathematics of another University expressed
his annoyance, "If you say 0 is equal to
what is there mathematics in it? And what I have to do
with it?" I humbly requested him to hand over my paper to
the Physics Department and thought because that the centre
of the circular movements of a needle in a clock remains
to be zero itself while watching the circular movements of
the needle in the clock perhaps he may feel, What is
there mathematics in it and what I have to do with it.
A Faculty in a Centre for Theoretical Studies
remarked that I should apply limits to 0 and
because mathematicians are expected to do it. I replied
that I have applied limits to 0 and also to
where I could apply it and I havent applied limits
to 0 and also to
where I could not apply it. |
