in mathematics is different from '0'
in physics and in the above condition the mathematical '0
unit' of potential energy at the point of application
of the forces turns around and becomes physically ''
units of kinetic energy at the same point.
|3. By analysing the
facts:- (1) sun and earth rotate about their axes and (2) the
planets interfering the forces of attraction exerted by sun and
earth do not effect the inertia of sun or earth; the scientists
can ascertain that (i) heavenly bodies maintain a 'free zero
position' and (ii) as no other force is active at the centre of
mass, the theorems reveal that 'uniform ceaseless rotations' is
the natural result of the 'free zero position'.
|4. The result is novel
and arresting and is broadly significant. Scientists can make
sure that a body launched into the space begins to rotate about
its axis and begins to revolve around the earth only when it
attains a 'free zero position' and if scientists can keep a body
in a 'free zero position' on the surface of earth, the body will
undergo ceaseless rotations and will provide endless energy.
physicists and astrophysicists all over the world will be eager
to know the details of the result in which a real combination of
is obvious; because the condition '0
'where a practical ''
gets mingled with a practical
is an 'open sesame' to the
|6. The photocopies of
the acknowledgments made by the different experts in
mathematics, physics and astrophysics are attached herewith. The
experts have not pointed out any defect with reference to their
subjects. The letter from Dr. Robert C. Kennicutt, Junior Editor
in Chief: The Astrophysical Journal, Tucson, U.S.A. may also be
|7. The result has not
been published in any research journal or science bulletin so
far. 'Mathrubhumi', The National Daily in Malayalam published a
sensational report that my scientific conclusions had been
waiting for a long time for the approval of the scientists.
|8. I have proved in this
article that '0 =
stands arithmetically, algebraically, trigonometrically,
geometrically, graphically and theoretically correct and the
equation '0 = ' has
been proved to be correct by applying appropriate formulae in
statics and dynamics, of course having given due consideration
to Newton's Laws of Motion and other conceptions approved by the
fundamental physics. When the movements at the centre of mass of
a heavenly body is taken into consideration we see that '0 = '
stands correct practically also.